The Danyang diamond saw blade in favor of the U.S. anti-dumping cases cited ponder



The Danyang diamond saw blade in favor of the U.S. anti-dumping cases cited ponder

ruled by the WTO, the United States in Chinese exports to the U.S. shrimp from anti-dumping investigation conducted by the diamond saw blade, the original calculation of dumping margins are not consistent with WTO rules, China in favor of a comprehensive case. The news diamond saw blades to Chinas export enterprises, China Diamond Saw export base – Danyang, diamond saw blades bring the gospel. In recent years China has made anti-dumping history of a rare victory. Chinese exports to the U.S. diamond saw no damage to the final ruling will be charged 164% anti-dumping tax to 0%. Chinese export enterprises in the globalization of international trade market long breath.
This rare cases of anti-dumping victory how to obtain, and how to get from 164% to 0%, it gave us what inspired him? First take a brief look at what happened:
May 2005, U.S. companies reference to the countrys customs statistics, China and South Korea exported to the U.S. diamond circular saw blades from 8.7 million in 2002 increased to 2004 years 13.4 million, resulting in U.S. companies do not enjoy the benefits of the construction industry boom, on the contrary compression U.S. corporate profit margins, leading to the bankruptcy of an enterprise, a number of corporate market share shrink their U.S. counterparts are “caught in the iron and steel embarrassing situation of rising energy costs and falling product prices, the increase in cheap imports from China Diamond Saw Blade, has caused substantial damage on the U.S. domestic industry. U.S. diamond saw blade manufacturer Union to submit the indictment to the U.S. Department of Commerce, diamond saw blades from China and South Koreas alleged dumping in the United States, requiring anti-dumping investigation.outnumbered cast.
May 16, the U.S. Commerce Department initially determined that Chinas enterprises dumping margin of 2.50% to 164.09%, the U.S. Commerce Department made a levy of 2.5% to 164.09% of the decision of anti-dumping duties on Chinese companies, which means that Chinas future exports to the U.S. diamond saw blade products, may be imposed punitive tariffs on not less than 200%. The two sides after more than a year of repeated trials, June 19, 2006, six members of the U.S. International Trade Commission has four diamond saw blade is not causing substantial damage to the U.S. domestic industry, not to levy anti-dumping duties, so Chinese exports to the U.S. diamond saw from the beginning to levy anti-dumping duty of 164.09 percent down to 14.9% of the weighted average tax rate, and ultimately to obtain the anti-dumping duties “zero” the best results.
February 2011, the Chinese government to the U.S. government anti-dumping case on China shrimp from “zero” approach to report on the WTO. July 22 China fill given request for consultations, “zero” in the anti-dumping measures taken by the US-China Diamond Saw also included in the dispute range. The WTO ruled that the United States in the diamond saw “zero” approach completely “zero” provides a successful case.
From this in favor of anti-dumping case to the U.S. diamond saw, we can get the following revelation: one of the
revelation: the role of government departments huge
the case at the beginning of the Ministry of Commerce is timely and relevant information passed to the export enterprises, so that enterprises can react in the shortest time in responding to the process, the Ministry of Commerce and actively help export enterprises to negotiate with the U.S. Department of Commerce to fight for more opportunity to win anti-dumping case our government to intervene, the U.S. Commerce Department in February 2006 to send personnel to China to carry out field verification. Local government departments to actively respond to Chinas exports of diamond saw blades base in Jiangsu Danyang Municipal Bureau of Commerce on the first time an urgent appeal to the Danyang of the 10 enterprises involved in foreign trade companies, requires that all the companies involved must participate in responding to the same time experienced anti-dumping, trade associations invite counsel to the relevant enterprises, training, and also set aside some funds to subsidize the enterprise, these acts no doubt our export business to win a lawsuit with a heavy weight. The second revelation of
: industry associations can not be ignored
Industry Association played a significant role in the process of responding to the organizations enterprise. An enterprise is often weak, and proved, especially in response to foreign anti-dumping, rely on a business alone to deal with it is very difficult, the cost is huge. Chamber of Commerce can play the strength and wisdom of the group, twisted into one rope, to jointly cope with difficulties. U.S. companies mention the complaint on May 3,aluminum for casting. 2005, China CCCME made quickly reflected in the May 11, held in Shanghai the respondent Work Conference, China Stone Material Industry Association and other related organizations, the legal profession repeated consultations of experts, as well as dozens of diamond saw blades enterprises and foreign trade companies, the indictment of the U.S., looking for a breakthrough in the case, and enhance the confidence of Chinas export enterprises have to win this lawsuit. Three of the
revelation: unity and cooperation as a whole played
anti-dumping against a class of varieties, rather than a business, the enterprises involved in the most taboo is a waiver of those standing on the sidelines, a report on the slip of the enterprise, the prosecution Congress based on their mastery of material will soon make a decision, and thus a failure in the end. If we are able to unity, cooperation, collective responding, not only can greatly reduce the funding of litigation, you can also play an integral force. The Chinese companies to win anti-dumping case, the joint of a number of enterprises played a huge role, Danyang Huachang first heard of the matter, the first time quickly organize local Feng Thailand, friends and, Lectra blade enterprise take the lead in the establishment of the first blade industry of anti-dumping response team, the same time, the initiative taken jointly by Aetna, Bo Sheng, Yi Kai, diamond saw blade with a “giant” to jointly deal with the U.S. anti-dumping pressure in 2006 six months of the Canton Fair, Jiangsu Huachang holding a printed form by the Commerce Department, called for more enterprises to participate in the complaint, responding eventually participate in the collective enterprises increased to 12 to play the advantages of group operations, laid a good foundation for the final victory. Four
revelation: the guidance of professionals can be said to the force
anti-dumping investigation is more complex international litigation case, a business in answering the questionnaire, sometimes hundreds of pages of content. So companies in the limited time to answer the need to fully and carefully prepared, it is best to please the professionals, in particular, has extensive knowledge of international trade law professionals. For example, the Jiangsu Danyang several enterprises together to hire professional lawyers of the anti-dumping lawsuit experience in Beijing Sega law firm. Export enterprises have a wealth of international trade and production and processing capacity, but to rally the international trade lawsuit sometimes knowing where to start. Professionals to join to make up for their shortcomings, is an important factor in the final to win.
Since the accession to the WTO, Chinas foreign trade environment as a whole improved, for China trade friction have become increasingly prominent, showing a continued warming trend in recent years, China has become the hardest hit of the anti-dumping. The diamond saw blade enterprises responding win proved once again that: as long as our government and industry associations to fully play a role in the enterprise seriously, and actively responding, commissioned by the rich experience of anti-dumping lawyer in the international economic situation more severe case, but also to win the favor of foreign anti-dumping investigation.


Tags:
f